The definition of a slave owner is anyone that has control or ownership over another human being.
The discussion isn't about if slavery is just or not, Mr. Mann is a slave owner and it is his right to keep slaves in order. What is the point of being a slave owner if you can’t keep slaves in order? If Mr. Mann wouldn't have taken charge, who knows how many other slaves would have revolted without punishment.
May I add that $10 in 1830 was worth over $280 in 1830. This is months of hard work for a slave owner in North Carolina so the amount of the fine is not a fair argument.
An African American is anatomically proven to be inferior to a white man. Their brains are smaller with thinner nerves and their cranial structure is less proportionate to that of a white.
The team found an owner was not liable for a battery on his slave, or for the exercise of authority. The court found that for the sake of their own happiness, slaves needed to surrender their will in implicit obedience to that of another. Such obedience was the consequence only of uncontrolled authority over the body. The power of the master had to be absolute to produce the complete submission of the slave. We have found that a slave could not appeal from his master's power and the master's power could not be usurped. The court found it was its duty to recognize the full dominion of the owner over the slave, except where the exercise of it was forbidden by statute. The court found that absolute dominion was essential to the value of slaves as property, to the security of the master, and to the public tranquility, which was greatly dependent upon the subordination of slaves.



